HE Set Design

Posted in Hare's Eye Production, KESSON, HUGH | Leave a comment

costumes update

I have to go on monday to see about discounts on uniforms from one store. I have also emailed another store to see if they would rent certian equipment. The following is the email i got back form them, I thought it would just be better to copy it here. The parts that are bold are his responses to the price:

Hi Blaire,
Following each of the items you inquired about will be two prices. The first will be the retail selling price and the second will be the Rental Charge. MOST of the items listed could be made available in TWO DAYS, possibly one depending on whether we receive a deposit before 2:00 pm so that we can order them in time. We do not have the quantity you’re interested in available in our store.

The first item, no. 1994 (helmets) are available in two sizes: S/M and L/XL.

Please call me with any further questions NOW that I know what you’re interested in.

1994 G.I. Style ABS Plastic Helmets X10 $40/20

Rothco Tactical Pasgt Type Ballistic Helmets X10 These are originals- far too expensive

G.I. Type Camouflage Helmet Covers in 9356 Army Digital Camo X10 $10/5

Tactical Assault Vest in 6583 Olive Drab X4 $40/20

6370 G.I. Type Foliage Green T-Shirt or 8570 Desert Sand Military T-Shirt X10 (price to rent and buy please) $6.00/3

2474 G.I Plus Army Digital Camo Double Strap Duffle Bag X10 (price to rent and buy please) $30/15

2482 G.I Surplus Double Strap Duffle Bag X10 (price to rent and buy please) $25/15

2415 Korean Army Surplus 2-Strap O.D. Nylon Duffle Bag X10 (price to rent and buy please) Not available any longer

So I was thinking we can rent some items….but with rentals at this store, we have to buy the items at full price first and when we bring them back nice and clean, they give the difference back to us. Let me know if this is something that we should do.

Also, in other news, one of my friends from the army just came back. Since his uuniform is the pattern we need, I asked him if we could use his uniform and boots for the production, and he said he’d get back to me on that. I’m hoping for an answer soon.

Blaire

Posted in HOLLIER, BLAIRE, Hare's Eye Production | Leave a comment

Jacques Prevert Poem Adaptation

Morning Breakfast by The Beach from Flemming Laursen on Vimeo.

Posted in LAURSEN, FLEMMING, Poem Adaptations, due October 21 | Leave a comment

Posted in DOUBLET, AUGUSTIN | Leave a comment

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Homework due October 14th ( “Ohio Impromptu” )

Thanks to the modern cinematic technics, the Reader and the  Listener are both played by the same actor, literally fulfilling Beckett’s instruction that the two characters should be “as alike in appearance as possible” and following the interpretation that they are really elements in the one personality.

Uncanny figuration in Beckett is indeed autonomously, if indelibly, implanted in our minds. Characters are doomed, haunted by their negatives.

What the psychoanalyst  Andre Green  describes as : “a striving towards the zero state”. Indeed, the notion of negative representation carries the representation of absence and the denial of that representation.

“Stay where we were so long alone together, my shade will comfort you.”

About the adaptation the set design, the smoothness of the camera movement as ; the pacing of the cut, everything invites us to feel like assisting to a play on stage. The immersion is as closed as it can be.

Posted in DOUBLET, AUGUSTIN, Homework, due October 14 | Leave a comment

Homework due September 30th

Homework due September 30th

In Peter Brook’s last scene, a somnambulist King Lear walks on the edge of the world of the living and the world of the death.  The intense and disturbing composition gives way to anxiety and despair. Our mythicals heroes are no longer shadows but fragments informs of shadow.

They’re like the fancies described by Allan Poe in Eureka.

In the essay, Poe talks about what he experienced in the mind on the brink of sleep:

“I say the absoluteness – for in these fancies – let me now term them psychal impressions – there is really nothing even approximate in character to impressions ordinarily received. It is as if the five senses were supplanted by five myriad others alien to mortality.”

In the silence the emptiness, heroes with faces like graves, executes their last march while the edgy editing blurs the lines between the delirium and the reality. and orchestrates  the last notes of the requiem.

With Brook, Lear’s nightmare, Lear’ s faith or destiny; this primitive and mythical fall of the man into dust, belongs to a doomed world.

No morality, no redemption, only some broken shades over a world that God has deserted.

Brook the end of the world precedes us.

In Kozintsev’s film the army witnesses Lear’s last Act, as a Chorus and, by their presence we expect them to spread and teach the morality of the tale. The mass faces the play. Therefore Kozintsev points out the moral aspect that underlines his grasp on the tale.

The decadence of Lear and his family announces the end of something, the end of an era.  The mass has learned their lesson.

Posted in DOUBLET, AUGUSTIN, Homework, due September 30 | Leave a comment

Poem Adaptation

Posted in ASFALL, SHICKONA | 2 Comments

Costumes

I spoke to the Veterans Organization on the campus. They told me they would ask to see if we could use some of the veterns’ uniforms in our production. we need the actors, though, so I know what sizes I’m asking for. I also found out about 2 thrift shops that should have some uniforms. I’ll try to check them out over the weekend. I didnt really find any sites for a better price then what Thomas found, still looking. And I’m still looking for a place that we could possibly rent. I was thinking that it would be a great idea to have a screening party when we are done with the film and invite everyone that helped with it, and give a copy of the film to them. I thing that by telling people, especially veterans, that there is something they could look forward to, we might get more help.

Posted in HOLLIER, BLAIRE, Hare's Eye Production | Leave a comment

Production report and homework oct. 14

Hey,

I have been working on an ending for Hare’s Eye. I have pitched my idea to Michael, so I will await the new script, before going to much in detail. But basically instead of going on a 100 km march, they go on a night patrol. They are being ambushed/getting shot at, and when trying to return fire, Vensky (or Axel) pulls out a pin of his flashbang/concussiongrenade/handgrenade. Dmitry sees this as it is happening. He punches him in the face, grabs the grenade from his harness, and jumps on top of it. Dmitry dies. End.

I was planning that we could shoot this in the studio with only a minimum of props, since it is night, and I feel the Afghanistan night is dark. Thursday I will be doing some trials btw 1 and 3 and from 5.30 to our class starts. Feel free to stop by and help or come up with some good ideas. I have discussed props with Hugh, and it is going to consist of sand and a single wall. Besides this, the uniform and weapon props are important. I should have something visual to show you tomorrow in class.

As for the Beckett plays:

I watched the second play: Ohio Impromptu. What struck me was the sound design. There were only a few sound sources. The voice of the reader, the knock from the listener,  sounds from the reader touching the book, and a monotonous noise. Towards the end, there is sounds of horses, a bird and a flying insect, which I will dwell into a little later. The voice of the reader is detailed. You can hear any imperfections in his speech and pronouncation. The knock is clear too. Over time, the sound of the back ground noise builds up, but the knock of the listener puts it down, only for it to grow back to the same strength it had before. This is repeated throughout the piece, until the end, where the noise changes apearance or sound. After that part, there is the before mentioned sounds of animals and a busy street.

The apearance of two identical characters, mirrors or doppelgaengers, suggest a state of unrealism. The two characters can not exist next to each other. Either they are imagination, a ghost, metaphors or something similar. Towards the end of the play, the reader disappears into thin air, and the listener is still sitting there. The colours turn from black and white to colours, and there is some “scene” sound.

The sound can be used to try to understand the interpretation of the director. Since the noise, that is annoying, yet strangely comforting, is being put down by the listener, I suggest that this is a metaphor of something that the listener has to make stop, but cannot. Like scratching your back, it will come back as soon as you have stopped scratching. Secondly, the ending with the reader disappearing and the listener staying, suggest a return from a dream state. There is again order, since there is not two identicals anymore. This is being underlined by the change into color, and into a well lit living room. However, the sound suggest, that we are in a pre modern time. We hear horse carriages, yet no automobiles? Clearly we have been sent to another time. Ohio Impromptu was written in 1980, when horse carriages were pretty uncommon. This again could point towards, that the ending is not a resolution towards a natural relieving of painful memory and returning to reality, but that the listener is stuck in another time, and will have to stay there.

Posted in LAURSEN, FLEMMING, due October 14 | Leave a comment

Hare’s Eye Production Report 10/14

Hello Classmates. I wanted to let you know briefly where we stand from a producer’s point of view:

1.Casting notices are up at Mandy.com and NYCastings.com. Unfortunately, you have to sign up for these sites to see the notices. However, we have already generated over 150 responses in 2 days, so we’re doing pretty well there! The audition date is now Oct. 28th.

2. Hugh, Flemming, and I have come up with a preliminary production budget for sets, props, and costumes. At this point, these are estimates and flexible, but it gives us a starting off point. We are working together to seek funding; however, this is not a guarantee. Check with Hugh regarding the list, and let him know if you have any of the items we can borrow. Costumes are a huge question mark right now, as they are expensive to get accurate, so if you have any ideas (such as friends or family who were in the military with uniforms, or super discount locations), talk to Blaire. Specifically, we’re looking for Digital Camouflage Battle Dress Units (or, Digi Camo BDU’s).

3. We would like to use the “kickstart” option for fund raising.  Check out www.kickstarter.com or www.indiegogo.com and let me know what you think. It’s basically like a pledge drive, but it’s all or nothing so we all need to get behind it! If we all agree, we can start next week. But if you have any other ideas of how to raise money, let me know!

4. As we’ve mentioned before, food is also a big concern. Averia and I will be checking out some restaurants and catering services, but if you know of resources for affordable food, cooks, or kitchens, let one of us know.

5. Micheal and Professor Patkanian have come up with a good description of the project. To stay consistent when talking, e-mailing, etc. about the project, please use the following language to promote it:

Brooklyn College Film & Television department is producing Hare’s Eye, a graduate level short film intended for festivals. The course is taught by an award winning filmmaker Irina Patkanian, who acts as an Executive Producer of the film.   The script is based on a story by a renowned Russian writer Dmitry Bakin (winner of the anti-Booker prize) which explores the complexities of life in the army.

When a new recruit arrives (Axel), Squad Leader Frank Briggs gets a feeling that he’s been marked by one of his own. For no apparent reason, Frank begins to bully and abuse Axel, until in the end we find out that he was merely fighting for his life. Simultaneously raw and lyrical, the story provides insights into life in the army beyond newspaper stereotypes. It is an opportunity to be a part of something rather unique.

Thanks everyone! Let’s keep working together to make this something we’re proud of putting on our resumes!

-Thomas

Posted in Hare's Eye Production, Professor Patkanian | Leave a comment

Hare’s Eye Production Report

I am assisting Flemming with camera assistance, but in the meantime am helping Thomas with line producing as a sort of production secretary..

I need to compile a list of trade outs that we need (as directed by Thomas and or Hugh) and find ways to assist Thomas in possible funding for the film.

Trade outs for Food:

1.  I can walk around the Midwood area and research online food vendors that could give us a free trays of food and drinks.

2. I know several personal chefs that would be willing to cook if they can be reimbursed for food costs. *Can we give name food sources in credit in return for food given?

Design Trade:

Design materials-my job may currently have design stuff they did not need in our storage for an HGTV show that did not get renewed from from earlier in the year. I can ask if the stuff is still there and see if Hugh can use any of it for the production.

Funding:

1. Thomas metioned quickly contacting a veteran’s society or organization to have someone come and speak to the class and possibly asking for a donation towards the film. *I would like to see what the final script looks like to see which organization would be best to contact.

2. Kickstarter http://www.kickstarter.com/ .. I am fine with, I already have $30 pledged from 3 friends and can collect $1 or $2 from most of my coworkers, maybe more. I will assist Thomas in setting this up and setting up a general budget, need to speak with him more about this.

Posted in GASKIN, AVERIA, Hare's Eye Production | 1 Comment

Hare’s Eye Disease

is being inability to close one or both eyes; so called from the popular idea that the hare sleeps with its eyes open.  It may be complete or partial, and may be due to paralysis of the seventh pair of cerebral nerves and orbicularis palpebrarum muscle or to spasm of the levator palpebral muscle or to absence of the upper lid, or to cicatices from wound or burns..

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/PEK91426.htm

at bottom of link

Posted in Hare's Eye Production | Leave a comment

Homework for Sept.16

I will start first with the version of Paul Scofield in Peter Brook’s film (UK/Denmark, 1971).

I believe the main  strength of this film is the way the camera is positioned to convey the strong point of view of the characters and the story line. The use of the camera makes you feel like you are not simply an audience member but you are on the person who is being spoken to, as if the fourth wall is broken down and non existent and although we see Goneril ad Regan, we see their reactions to their father cursing them, etc., it seems like the viewer is the who is the anger is being directed back and is taking the beating.

This is well seen when Goneril is approaching her father and we see her ascend in her black furry type cape and there is a close up shot of just Lear’s face and he is praying or speaking internally saying:

“Who comes here? O heavens,
If you do love old men, if your sweet sway
Allow obedience, if yourselves are old,
Make it your cause; send down, and take my part!”

This is interesting because we do not see his mouth moving, just his eyes and we hear the voice over of his thoughts, he is reacting to the situation of being the outcast of his daughters, Goneril even approaches him and he actually speaks to her. The intensity of the shot and Lear’s eyes makes you feel like are the one being spoken to, the viewer is being shown with such intensity his eyes, it is hard to look away from someone looking at you. You can not help but look back, especially if the person he is about to actually converse with in the scene is not even within speaking distance yet.

And I love the very moment Goneril shows up. Regan appears more confident or somewhat powerful. Their very presence together shows strength, it surely threatens Lear. It is not just his daughters saying no to him, it is the fact that they are “teaming” up and saying no and the fact that they are not afraid of him, not in the least. They are the ones in control, Lear knows this and Lear shakes his head in disbelief and confusion and perhaps fear, at least a little bit of it. I see this when Regan says:

“You will return and sojourn with my sister,
Dismissing half your train, come then to me:.

I also like the camera shot after this. Lear says:

“Return to her, and fifty men dismiss’d?”

And we see the back of Regan’s blonde hair (?) and Lear is elevated and his eyes are cast downwards.  The viewer feels very much to be in the position that Lear is speaking to them because we do not really see Regan’s face, we just see the back of her head. Her face is irrelevant, we see see the emotions expressed to her by her father looking down on her, literally.

And then the closeup intensity of the scene with Goneril and Lear when Goneril says “At your choice sir”.

I think this scene is interesting because Goneril is wearing  a back feather/furry coat like her father wore in the beginning scene of film when dividing his kingdom. And Lear does not elevate himself as he did with Regan. He comes down to wear Goneril is and is in her face. She doesn’t flinch in fear. I believe she knows the roles between them are switched now and she doesn’t have to.

The last part I enjoyed was the last cry by Lear when he says “Question not the need!” The camera focuses in on his entire face, he comes extremly close to the shot, until you are seeing his eyes again. The viewer feels that Lear is just inches away from his or her face. Then as Lear says the word “beasts”, there is a pan to both sisters and the camera closes in on them, as Lear is doing to the viewer. It is like this is the very motion of what Lear’s words are doing. Yet, the sisters do not move, Lear does. He walks very boxlike into the scene. Then, as he got into your face, he walks out, boxlike, backwards in the shot.

I also liked how after this scene, there were a lot of close ups, even of the horses in the storm. I would have loved to see this in color, the earthy materials in the film: the wood of the set (including the wooden stick/min staff Lear has in this scene), the leather, the fur, the feather, very interesting stuff. I even see the breath of the actors in the colod air, how intricate the film is without color…!

I also like how the actors, their necks are covered, with fur, with feathers, etc. This reminds me of the word “stiff necked” stubborn, etc.

Now, to discuss Jüri Järvet in Grigorii Kozintsev’s film (Russia, 1970).

This scene shows a very contemplative, intuitive and quiet King Lear. He seems solitary, even with other people. He is seen sitting at a long table, with his hand underneath is chin. And there is space between him and the other people. He is seated ahead of the others, with them in the backround. When he gets up, he is walking ahead of the others in the backround and there is a definite space in the blocking that the director is using to place the characters.

When Regan greets her father,  it appear very friendly, even caring and loving..he takes her by the hand, she sits next to him as if an equal and she kisses his hand and put it to her face. She asks him to return to her other sister. Then Lear responds by saying:

“Dear daughter, I am old.”

He puts his hands together as people do when they pray. He does not seem threatening in any specific way.

I like the backround in the shot of him walking to greet Goneril when he says:

“Oh, heavens, if you love old men.”

It is a wide shot (most of the scene seems to be shot in a wide angle) and the wind is blowing his hair. iI seems as if he is walking outside into “fresh air”.

And like the Peter Brooks movie, the very min. Goneril enters the scene, the sisters are seen as a power duo. Here, they are wearing the same exact clothes basically, walking with the same rhythm towards King Lear, speaking with one following the other. And very quickly, it pans to the audience watching, and the audience is commenting, whispering.

The only time Lear is spacially close to the “power sisters” is when he yells to command their attention to response as they walk past him. He says:

“But yet, though art my flesh”.

Even when he is close o Goneril, she is not even looking at him. Like the wounded King is not even worth a glance. She is listening to him, however. And Kign Lear continues to walk after them and literally closes the door on his face!

He is seen as completely alone at the end. Just his speech to the heaves and the skies. He looks up at the heavens and speaks, perhaps to get attention from the gods to glance on his poor condition, for at least to gain sympathy from somewhere. And then the scene cuts to a big shot of the cloudy sky and loud, brassy/trumpet dramatic sound with drums.

And as he leaves the town and tells the fool he will go mad, he is shut out yet again, by the guards. He is not very welcome in many places to many people…

Posted in Avery Gaskin, due September 16 | Leave a comment

Production Design- for Tuesday

The Production Crew would appreciate your input and help:  please check your emails for an attachment or Google doc with a list of things that we will need to acquire for Hare’s Eye.  Please either adapt the document on Google docs- you have all been given editing status, or email me back the document with any changes.  Please highlight/ underline/ make bold anything you have added/ changed.  Please can you get back to me by 12pm Tuesday- it should only take you 10 min to have a look/think/add anything in- for example- if you have an old fashioned corn broom at home we’d love to borrow it for the production.  Thanks, Hugh

Posted in Hare's Eye Production, KESSON, HUGH | 1 Comment

Homework due October 14

1. “Hare’s Eye” Continue developing your area. Please post a report. Make sure to categorize it under YOUR NAME and “Hare’s Eye productions.”

2. Watch all clips below from “Beckett on Film” DVDs. Post your analysis of one clip: Damien O’Donnell’s “What Where” or Charles Sturridge’s “Ohio Impromptu.” Discuss specifically director’s interpretation and how it is conveyed visually and dramatically. Watching clips from the documentary may be helpful.

I have also posted my 2003 class’s production of “What, Where” starring professor Wasser. Watch it if you want, no need to comment.

1. What Where, dir. by Damien O’Donnell  with Sean McGinley, Gary Lewis

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

2. Clip from the documentary about making of “What Where”

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

3. Ohio Impromptu, dir. by Charles Sturridge, with Jeremy Irons

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

4. Clip from the documentary about making of “Ohio Impromptu”

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

5. Clip from the documentary about making of “Play”

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

6. Clip from the documentary about Beckett and film vs. theater

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

7. 2003 TVR 50 class production of Beckett’s “What Where” edited by Paulina Knitter, with Professor Frederick Wasser

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

Posted in Beckett, Professor Patkanian, due October 14 | Leave a comment

Transferring media

Sooooo i finally found a pretty simple way to import things to final cut pro without downloading any converter…this is the link…hope this helps out some of you

Posted in LOOR, DANIEL | 1 Comment

Brook’s Lear in one sentence.

In this version Peter Brook has adapted King Lear into a timeless counter-parable where the message is that when we at last realize the folly of trusting in illusions, at the end of the greatest charade of them all, life, those who are most successful at living within pretenses are most painfully disabused by the realization that power, loyalty, ambition, success and reputation are fickle friends whose desertion is complete in our final moments.

Posted in KESSON, HUGH, due September 30 | Leave a comment

Costumes for Film

Posted in HOLLIER, BLAIRE, Hare's Eye Production | Leave a comment

My report from last week

Hey everybody

First I’d Like to repost my sentence(s) on “The King is Alive“. Let me briefly sketch out the action, before going into the essence of the movie. A bus of tourists get lost in the middle of an African dessert. They are stranded in a little township with only a single man living there. They have almost no food or water. While waiting for help, they decide to put up King Lear, which one of the tourists can remember by heart (sort of). They each get assigned a role, and without spoiling the ending, it is safe to say, that it is just as tragic as Shakespeare’s King Lear.

So, in a sentence, what is this movie about. It shows the beauty and cruelty of Shakespeare’s text, and takes its relation to the heath and the storm a step further. The nature becomes the real adversary, just as the play in the end destroys the characters.

Second, I’d like to give my report for Hare’s Eye. I was asked to research into what happens when your eyelids are burned off, and you can’t close your eyes.

Above is Walter Yeo. He was a British sailor, that was wounded at the battle of Jutland in 1916 during WW1. His eyelids were burned so bad, he couldn’t close them, so he had skin grafted to his eye areas.

I had heard, that you would use the hands to protect the eyes, but I couldn’t find any evidence to this.

Maybe this can be useful in the dream sequences.

Posted in Hare's Eye Production, Homework, LAURSEN, FLEMMING | Leave a comment